The School Committee on Wednesday agreed to explore the idea of allowing public participation in discussion throughout its meetings -- rather than confining public comments to a short period at the beginning of every session.

Vice Chair Michael Flaherty raised the issue of allowing broader public participation, noting that the committee often votes on issues presented for the first time at a meeting, leaving citizens -- even those at the meeting -- with no opportunity to voice their opinions.

Committee member Rhonda Veugen said that she’d done some research on the subject, and said the community could benefit from having a bigger say in what goes on at meetings.

“I would like us to explore it,” she said.

Other members greeted the idea with skepticism.

“I am not in favor of public participation at will. We can’t have that,” said Melvin Lazarus, noting that the public has plenty of time to see what’s on a meeting agenda and to speak at the beginning of meetings.

Chair Clifford Sylvia suggested referring the idea to the School Committee's policy subcommittee for study and recommendations.

“I”m not convinced the policy we have now doesn't let anyone talk. Anyone can ask for a hearing,” he said. “Anyone can get something put on an agenda.”

Sylvia suggested opening up discussion for 15 minutes following meetings, but expressed concern about the effect of constant public participation.

“This is a deliberative business meeting,” he said. “I’ve seen some of the problems that can come about when they have open dialogue. I’m not overwhelmed about changing the existing policy.”

Geoff Swett suggested a pilot program.

“If we open it up to whatever extent . . . and it proves to be something that prevents us from being able to finish a meeting . . . we always have the ability to go back,” he said.

Swett said he liked the idea of creating an environment where more people were inclined to attend meetings. “I don’t think its something we should discount as too difficult,” he said.

The Committee agreed to have the policy subcommittee discuss the issue and come back with suggestions.